SatsAtlas

The energy question

Does Bitcoin waste energy? Look what else uses more.

Yes, Bitcoin uses electricity — about 150 TWh a year. That's real. But “uses energy” isn't the same as “wastes energy,” and the number only means something next to what else we plug in. So here it is, beside things nobody calls a crisis.

Annual electricity, in TWh

Air conditioning & cooling

13× Bitcoin~2,000 TWh

Keeping rooms a few degrees cooler.

IEA, The Future of Cooling

Data centres (excl. crypto)

2.8× Bitcoin~415 TWh

Ads, autoplay, the cloud, AI.

IEA, 2024

The traditional banking system

1.7× Bitcoin~260 TWh

Branches, card networks, ATMs, datacentres.

Galaxy Digital, 2021 est.

Bitcoin network

baseline~150 TWh

A neutral, borderless, 24/7 settlement network anyone can use.

Cambridge CBECI

Gold mining

0.9× Bitcoin~131 TWh

Digging metal out of the ground to lock it back in vaults.

Industry estimates

Always-on / standby devices(US)

0.9× Bitcoin~130 TWh

Gadgets drawing power doing nothing, in U.S. homes alone.

U.S. DOE / LBNL est.

PC & console gaming

0.5× Bitcoin~75 TWh

Fun — but nobody calls it a waste.

LBNL / industry est.

Clothes dryers(US)

0.4× Bitcoin~60 TWh

Tumbling towels dry instead of hanging them — U.S. homes.

U.S. EIA / LBNL est.

Online adult content (streaming)

0.3× Bitcoin~52 TWh

Streamed worldwide, every day. Useful?

The Shift Project, 2019 est. (debated)

Indoor cannabis growing(US)

0.1× Bitcoin~20 TWh

Growing weed indoors under lamps — roughly 1% of U.S. power.

Mills, 2012 est. (dated)

Christmas lights(US)

0.05× Bitcoin~7 TWh

Six weeks of festive glow — in the U.S. alone.

U.S. DOE est.

Too slippery to chart — too telling to skip

Some things don’t come with an honest kilowatt figure — the companies don’t disclose it, or the public estimates are all over the map. We won’t fake a bar for them. But they’re worth seeing, because nobody calls them a crisis either.

TikTok

≈ 50 Mt CO₂e / yr

About the same carbon as the entire country of Greece — for short-form video. No official kWh figure exists, so this is in carbon, not TWh. Nobody is calling for a ban.

Greenly, 2024 est.

Video streaming (Netflix, YouTube & co.)

tens–hundreds of TWh

Estimates swing wildly and are hotly contested — Netflix self-reports ~0.5 TWh; others model 90+ TWh for Netflix alone. Whatever the true figure, it's large and growing — and nobody's outraged.

IEA / The Shift Project (disputed)

Bitcoin sits in the same ballpark as gold mining and the banking system it competes with — and a fraction of what we spend keeping rooms cool or servers humming. The difference is what it buys: money no government can debase or switch off.

Win the argument

Next time someone says Bitcoin wastes energy — send them this.

Figures are best-available public estimates (TWh/year), rounded; the “× Bitcoin” multiple is each figure divided by Bitcoin’s ~150 TWh/yr (Cambridge CBECI). Methodologies vary widely — especially for diffuse uses like streaming, standby and short-form video — so treat this as an order-of-magnitude comparison, not a precise ledger. Sources: IEA (cooling, data centres, streaming), Galaxy Digital (banking), Cambridge CBECI (Bitcoin), U.S. DOE / EIA / LBNL (standby, gaming, dryers, Christmas lights), Mills 2012 (indoor cannabis), Greenly 2024 (TikTok). Each row is labelled with its own source above.