The stories hidden inside every block.

Block 954937 was mined by an unknown miner with 5,885 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •5,885 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.62 MB

Block 954936 was mined by an unknown miner with 7,020 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •7,020 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.58 MB

Block 954935 was mined by an unknown miner with 2,618 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 11/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •2,618 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.13 MB

Block 954934 was mined by an unknown miner with 5,842 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •5,842 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.64 MB

Block 954933 was mined by an unknown entity — either a solo miner or a private pool not publicly identified — which is increasingly rare in today's mining landscape. It's also unusually full, squeezing in 6,564 transactions right up against Bitcoin's block weight limit. Curiously, the total fees collected round down to zero BTC, which makes this block a genuine head-scratcher.

• •🔢 6,564 transactions — a packed block
• •⚖️ Block size: 1.61 MB, filled to the weight limit
• •💸 Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC (effectively nothing)
• •❓ Mined by an unknown or solo miner — no pool identified

Block 954932 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone (or a small operation) not affiliated with any known mining pool — which is increasingly rare in today's competitive landscape. They filled the block almost entirely to its weight limit with over 6,000 transactions. Curiously, the total fees collected add up to essentially zero, which is unusual for such a busy block.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 6,073 — a notably packed block
• •Block size: 1.57 MB, right up against the limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

An unknown solo miner — not a big mining pool — found this block and filled it almost completely to Bitcoin's weight limit with 4,388 transactions. The elevated on-chain data suggests significant inscription activity, where people embed data like images or text directly into Bitcoin transactions. Curiously, the total fees collected round to zero BTC, which is unusual for a block this busy.

• •Mined by: unknown solo miner (not a pool)
• •Transactions: 4,388 — a notably heavy block
• •Block size: 2.24 MB, pushed near the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954930 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone operating outside the big mining pools — which is a relatively rare sight on the Bitcoin network today. They filled the block almost completely to its weight limit, squeezing in 7,082 transactions. Curiously, the total fees collected add up to essentially zero BTC, which is unusual for a block this full.

• •Miner: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 7,082 — a notably packed block
• •Block size: 1.59 MB, filled right to the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954,929 was mined by an unknown entity — likely a solo miner rather than a large mining pool — which is a rare sight these days. They packed it with 5,927 transactions and pushed it right to the block weight limit, leaving virtually no space unused. What makes this extra curious is that all those transactions were processed for zero fees in BTC terms.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 5,927 — a notably high count
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC
• •Block size: 1.76 MB, filled to the weight limit

Block 954678 was mined by an unknown miner with 6,663 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •6,663 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.60 MB

Block 954677 was mined by an unknown miner with 5,650 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •5,650 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.65 MB

Block 954676 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,634 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,634 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.53 MB

Block 954675 was mined by an unknown miner with 5,922 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •5,922 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.68 MB

Block 954674 was mined by an unknown miner with 6,996 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 45/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •6,996 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.58 MB

This block was mined by an unknown solo miner rather than a large mining pool — a rare feat in today's competitive Bitcoin mining landscape. It's also unusually full, squeezing in 5,523 transactions right up to Bitcoin's block weight limit. Interestingly, the total fees collected are reported as 0.000 BTC, which makes this block worth a closer look.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 5,523 — a notably packed block
• •Block size: 1.62 MB, filled to the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954672 was mined by an unknown solo miner — a rare sight in an era dominated by large mining pools. It's also unusually full, squeezing in 5,815 transactions right up to Bitcoin's block weight limit. Solo mining means a single person (or small operation) solved the cryptographic puzzle and claimed the entire block reward themselves.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 5,815 — a packed block
• •Block size: 1.67 MB, near the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954671 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone operating outside any major mining pool — which is a rare sight in today's highly competitive mining landscape. They filled the block almost entirely to its weight limit with 6,881 transactions, making it one of the busiest blocks around. Curiously, the total fees recorded are 0.00 BTC, which may reflect a data quirk worth watching.

• •⛏️ Miner: Unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •📦 Transactions: 6,881 — a notably packed block
• •📐 Block size: 1.58 MB, filled right up to the weight limit
• •💸 Total fees: 0.000 BTC (unusual — may be a data anomaly)

Block 954670 was mined by an unknown entity — likely a solo miner rather than a large pool — which is a rare sight in today's highly competitive mining landscape. They filled it almost entirely to the block weight limit with 4,499 transactions, squeezing in as much activity as possible. What's unusual is that all those transactions came with essentially zero fees recorded, making this block a curious data point.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major mining pool)
• •Transactions: 4,499 — a notably heavy block
• •Block size: 1.49 MB, packed right up to the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954669 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone operating outside the big mining pools — which is a relatively rare sight these days. They squeezed in 6,002 transactions and filled the block almost entirely to its weight limit. Curiously, the total fees recorded came to zero BTC, making this an unusual block worth a closer look.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 6,002 — a notably packed block
• •Block size: 1.58 MB, right at the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954636 squeezed 4,585 transactions into its full 1.61 MB frame, hitting right up against the weight limit. Despite all that activity, the total fees paid were just 0.023 BTC — a sign that most of these transactions were lightweight and sent when the mempool wasn't demanding much. It's a neat example of how a 'busy' block and a 'cheap' block can be the same block.

• •⛏️ Mined by NiceHash on June 21, 2026 at 03:34 UTC
• •📬 4,585 transactions — a heavily packed block
• •💸 Total fees: 0.023 BTC (median rate: ~1.7 sat/vB, well below typical busy-period rates)
• •📐 Block size: 1.61 MB — filled right to the weight limit

Block 954481 is packed to the brim with 5,102 transactions — yet the total fees collected amount to just 0.018 BTC, which is unusually low for a block this full. That's because nearly every transaction paid the bare minimum: about 1 sat/vB (satoshis per virtual byte, the standard unit for Bitcoin transaction fees). NiceHash filled the block right up to its weight limit, squeezing in as many cheap transactions as possible.

• •Mined by NiceHash on June 20, 2026 at 02:12 UTC
• •5,102 transactions — a densely packed block
• •Total fees: 0.018 BTC (very low for this volume)
• •Median fee rate: ~1.0 sat/vB, essentially the floor price to get included

Block 954292 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,319 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,319 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.64 MB

Block 954291 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,144 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,144 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.51 MB

Block 954290 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,525 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,525 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.58 MB

Block 954289 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,179 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,179 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.60 MB

Block 954288 was mined by an unknown miner with 4,551 transactions and 0.000 BTC in fees. Our analysis scored it 35/100.

• •Mining pool: an unknown miner
• •4,551 transactions
• •0.000 BTC in fees
• •Block size: 1.56 MB

Block 954287 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone outside the big mining pools who solved the puzzle entirely on their own, a rare feat. They packed it with 6,675 transactions, pushing the block right up to Bitcoin's weight limit. Curiously, the recorded fees came in at effectively zero BTC, which makes this block an unusual one to study.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 6,675 — a packed, high-volume block
• •Block size: 1.59 MB, filled to the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954286 was mined by an unknown solo miner — someone operating outside the big mining pools — which is increasingly rare. They packed in 6,100 transactions and filled the block nearly to its weight limit, making every byte count. Zero fees recorded makes this one worth a second look.

• •Mined by an unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •6,100 transactions — a notably packed block
• •Block size: 1.80 MB, right up against the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC

Block 954,285 was mined by an unknown or solo miner — someone operating outside the big mining pools — which is a rare sight these days. They filled it nearly to Bitcoin's block weight limit with 5,211 transactions, making it one busy block. What's unusual is that all those transactions settled for zero reported fees, which is worth a curious look.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a major pool)
• •Transactions: 5,211 — a packed block
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC
• •Block size: 1.81 MB, right up against the weight limit

Block 954,284 was mined by an unknown solo miner, a rare feat in an era dominated by large mining pools. It's also impressively full, squeezing in 7,138 transactions right up to Bitcoin's block weight limit. Curiously, total fees round to zero BTC, making this an unusual combination of a stuffed block and negligible fees.

• •Mined by: unknown / solo miner (not a recognized pool)
• •Transactions: 7,138 — well above the typical block
• •Block size: 1.58 MB, filled to the weight limit
• •Total fees collected: 0.000 BTC